Inflammatory profile of convalescent plasma to treat COVID: Impact of amotosalen/UVA pathogen reduction technology.

Blood products in therapeutic transfusion are now commonly acknowledged to contain biologically active constituents during the processes of preparation. In the midst of a worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, preliminary evidence suggests that convalescent plasma may lessen the severity of COVID-19 if administered early in the disease, particularly in patients with profound B-cell lymphopenia and prolonged COVID-19 symptoms. This study examined the influence of photochemical Pathogen Reduction Treatment (PRT) using amotosalen-HCl and UVA light in comparison with untreated control convalescent plasma (n= 72 - paired samples) - cFFP, regarding soluble inflammatory factors: sCD40L, IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, TNF-alpha and ex-vivo inflammatory bioactivity on endothelial cells. We didn't observe significant modulation of the majority of inflammatory soluble factors (8 of 10 molecules tested) pre- or post-PRT. We noted that IL-8 concentrations were significantly decreased in cFFP with PRT, whereas the IL-18 concentration was increased by PRT. In contrast, endothelial cell release of IL-6 was similar whether cFFP was pre-treated with or without PRT. Expression of CD54 and CD31 in the presence of cFFP were similar to control levels, and both were significant decreased in when cFFP had been pre-treated by PRT. It will be interesting to continue investigations of IL-18 and IL-8, and the physiopathological effect of PRT- treated convalescent plasma and in clinical trials. But overall, it appears that cFFP post-PRT were not excessively pro-inflammatory. Further research, including a careful clinical evaluation of CCP-treated patients, will be required to thoroughly define the clinical relevance of these findings.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence surveys in blood donors before the vaccination campaign, France 2020-2021.

We conducted a cross-sectional study for SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 IgG prevalence in French blood donors (n = 32605), from March-2020 to January-2021. A mathematical model combined seroprevalence with a daily number of hospital admissions to estimate the probability of hospitalization upon infection and determine the number of infections while correcting for antibody decay. There was an overall seroprevalence increase over the study period and we estimate that ∼15% of the French population had been infected by SARS-CoV-2 by January-2021. The infection/hospitalization ratio increased with age, from 0.31% (18-30yo) to 4.5% (61-70yo). Half of the IgG-S1 positive individuals had no detectable antibodies 4 to 5 months after infection. The seroprevalence in group O donors (7.43%) was lower (p = 0.003) than in A, B, and AB donors (8.90%). We conclude, based on seroprevalence data and mathematical modeling, that a large proportion of the French population was unprotected against severe disease prior to the vaccination campaign.

Inflammatory markers and auto-Abs to type I IFNs in COVID-19 convalescent plasma cohort study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) contains neutralising anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that may be useful as COVID-19 passive immunotherapy in patients at risk of developing severe disease. Such plasma from convalescent patients may also have additional immune-modulatory properties when transfused to COVID-19 patients. METHODS: CCP (n = 766) was compared to non-convalescent control plasma (n = 166) for soluble inflammatory markers, ex-vivo inflammatory bioactivity on endothelial cells, neutralising auto-Abs to type I IFNs and reported adverse events in the recipients. FINDINGS: CCP exhibited a statistically significant increase in IL-6 and TNF-alpha levels (0.531 ± 0.04 vs 0.271 ± 0.04; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07371-0.4446; p = 0.0061) and 0.900 ± 0.07 vs 0.283 ± 0.07 pg/mL; (95% [CI], 0.3097-0.9202; p = 0.0000829) and lower IL-10 (0.731 ± 0.07 vs 1.22 ± 0.19 pg/mL; (95% [CI], -0.8180 to -0.1633; p = 0.0034) levels than control plasma. Neutralising auto-Abs against type I IFNs were detected in 14/766 (1.8%) CCPs and were not associated with reported adverse events when transfused. Inflammatory markers and bioactivity in CCP with or without auto-Abs, or in CCP whether or not linked to adverse events in transfused patients, did not differ to a statistically significant extent. INTERPRETATION: Overall, CCP exhibited moderately increased inflammatory markers compared to the control plasma with no discernible differences in ex-vivo bioactivity. Auto-Abs to type I IFNs detected in a small fraction of CCP were not associated with reported adverse events or differences in inflammatory markers. Additional studies, including careful clinical evaluation of patients treated with CCP, are required in order to further define the clinical relevance of these findings. FUNDING: French National Blood Service-EFS, the Association "Les Amis de Rémi" Savigneux, France, the "Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (Medical Research Foundation)-REACTing 2020".

Inflammatory profile of convalescent plasma to treat COVID: Impact of amotosalen/UVA pathogen reduction technology

Blood products in therapeutic transfusion are now commonly acknowledged to contain biologically active constituents during the processes of preparation. In the midst of a worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, preliminary evidence suggests that convalescent plasma may lessen the severity of COVID-19 if administered early in the disease, particularly in patients with profound B-cell lymphopenia and prolonged COVID-19 symptoms. This study examined the influence of photochemical Pathogen Reduction Treatment (PRT) using amotosalen‐HCl and UVA light in comparison with untreated control convalescent plasma (n= 72 – paired samples) - cFFP, regarding soluble inflammatory factors: sCD40L, IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, TNF-alpha and ex-vivo inflammatory bioactivity on endothelial cells. We didn’t observe significant modulation of the majority of inflammatory soluble factors (8 of 10 molecules tested) pre- or post-PRT. We noted that IL-8 concentrations were significantly decreased in cFFP with PRT, whereas the IL-18 concentration was increased by PRT. In contrast, endothelial cell release of IL-6 was similar whether cFFP was pre-treated with or without PRT. Expression of CD54 and CD31 in the presence of cFFP were similar to control levels, and both were significant decreased in when cFFP had been pre-treated by PRT. It will be interesting to continue investigations of IL-18 and IL-8, and the physiopathological effect of PRT- treated convalescent plasma and in clinical trials. But overall, it appears that cFFP post-PRT were not excessively pro-inflammatory. Further research, including a careful clinical evaluation of CCP-treated patients, will be required to thoroughly define the clinical relevance of these findings.

Reduced neutralizing antibody potency of COVID-19 convalescent vaccinated plasma against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant displays increased infectiveness as well as mutations resulting in reduced neutralizing activity of antibodies acquired after vaccination or infection involving earlier strains. To assess the ability of vaccinated COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP-V) collected before November 2021 to seroneutralize Omicron, we compared neutralizing antibody (nAb) titres of 63 samples against Omicron and earlier B.1 (D614G) strains. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Relationship between anti-Omicron titres and IgG anti-S1 levels (binding arbitrary unit: BAU/ml) was studied. Although correlated, anti-Omicron titres were significantly lower than anti-B.1 titres (median = 80 [10-1280] vs. 1280 [160-10,240], p < 0.0001). Omicron nAb titres and IgG anti-S1 levels were correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.67). Anti-S1 IgG threshold at 7000 BAU/ml may allow to discard CCP-V without anti-Omicron activity (nAb titre <40). Conversely, only those with highest titres (≥160) had systematically anti-S1 IgG levels >7000 BAU/ml. CONCLUSION: A fraction of CCP-V collected before November 2021 retains anti-Omicron seroneutralizing activity that may be selected by quantitative anti-IgG assays, but such assays do not easily allow the identification of 'high-titre' CCP-V. However, collecting plasma from vaccinated donors recently infected with Omicron may be the best option to provide optimal CCP-V for immunocompromised patients infected with this variant.

COVID-19 convalescent plasma: Evolving strategies for serological screening in France.

Quantitation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) is a key parameter in determining the effective dose for treatment with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP). Interpretation of results from clinical trials conducted worldwide requires comparison of Nabs titres obtained from different methods. As virus neutralization tests (VNTs) are not standardized scalable or commercially available, strategies based on intensity of ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay) or chemiluminescent binding serological tests were implemented to allow comparisons and establish criteria for determining 'high-titres' of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Abs). To this end, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has proposed criteria to define high-titre plasmas using different serological assays, including the one used in France for the CCP SARS-CoV-2 Abs screening (Euroimmun anti-S1 IgG). A retrospective study revealed that when using the FDA criteria (ELISA signal-to-cut-off [S/C ratio] ≥3.5), 91% of CCP had Nabs titres ≥40 as assessed with an in-house VNT. French strategy to ensure sufficient stocks of CCP of increasing titre has evolved over time. Recently, we improved our strategy by collecting only plasma from vaccinated convalescent donors as we confirmed that the mean IgG antibody level (ELISA S/C ratio) was significantly higher in plasma from vaccinated convalescent donors compared to donations from unvaccinated convalescent donors: 9.31 (CI 95%: 8.46-10.16) versus 3.22 (CI 95%: 3.05-3.39) (p < 0.001).

Convalescent plasma improves overall survival in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancy and COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort and propensity score analysis.

Patients with hematological malignancy and COVID-19 display a high mortality rate. In such patients, immunosuppression due to underlying disease and previous specific treatments impair humoral response, limiting viral clearance. Thus, COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) therapy appears as a promising approach through the transfer of neutralizing antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2. We report the effect of CCP in a cohort of 112 patients with hematological malignancy and COVID-19 and a propensity score analysis on subgroups of patients with B-cell lymphoid disease treated (n = 81) or not (n = 120) with CCP between May 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021. The overall survival of the whole cohort was 65% (95% CI = 56-74.9) and 77.5% (95% CI = 68.5-87.7) for patients with B-cell neoplasm. Prior anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy was associated with better overall survival, whereas age, high blood pressure, and COVID-19 severity were associated with a poor outcome. After an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach, we observed in anti-CD20-exposed patients with B-cell lymphoid disease a decreased mortality of 63% (95% CI = 31-80) in the CCP-treated group compared to the CCP-untreated subgroup, confirmed in the other sensitivity analyses. Convalescent plasma may be beneficial in COVID-19 patients with B-cell neoplasm who are unable to mount a humoral immune response.

The risk of COVID-19 death is much greater and age-dependent with type I IFN autoantibodies.

SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rate (IFR) doubles with every five years of age from childhood onward. Circulating autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α, IFN-ω, and/or IFN-ß are found in ~20% of deceased patients across age groups. In the general population, they are found in ~1% of individuals aged 20-70 years and in >4% of those >70 years old. With a sample of 1,261 deceased patients and 34,159 uninfected individuals, we estimated both IFR and relative risk of death (RRD) across age groups for individuals carrying autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs, relative to non-carriers. For autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α2 or IFN-ω, the RRD was 17.0[95% CI:11.7-24.7] for individuals under 70 years old and 5.8[4.5-7.4] for individuals aged 70 and over, whereas, for autoantibodies neutralizing both molecules, the RRD was 188.3[44.8-774.4] and 7.2[5.0-10.3], respectively. IFRs increased with age, from 0.17%[0.12-0.31] for individuals <40 years old to 26.7%[20.3-35.2] for those ≥80 years old for autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α2 or IFN-ω, and from 0.84%[0.31-8.28] to 40.5%[27.82-61.20] for the same two age groups, for autoantibodies neutralizing both molecules. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs increase IFRs, and are associated with high RRDs, particularly those neutralizing both IFN-α2 and -ω. Remarkably, IFR increases with age, whereas RRD decreases with age. Autoimmunity to type I IFNs appears to be second only to age among common predictors of COVID-19 death.

SARS-CoV-2 and post-donation information: a one-year experience of the French haemovigilance network.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence to support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 is probably not transmissible by blood transfusion. In this study, we use the data gathered over one year by the French haemovigilance network on post-donation information related to SARS-CoV-2, and virological investigations on corresponding plasma to explore viral transmission by transfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whenever a donor reported COVID-19 symptoms and/or a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal (NP) PCR test, information regarding diagnosis and symptoms was collected using a specific questionnaire, and repository plasmas were screened using the SARS-COV-2 R-GENE® assay (Biomérieux). RNA sequencing (Sanger and deep sequencing) and virus isolation on Vero E6 cells were applied in plasma from donors testing positive. RESULTS: We investigated 1,092 SARS-CoV-2-related post-donation information (PDI) reports. PDI donors were younger than the global donor population and donated more often in the Paris region. Sixty-eight percent reported a positive NP real-time (RT)-PCR or antigenic testing and 22% of these also had symptoms at the time of testing. Thirty-seven (3.4%) donations tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, 11 (30%) were confirmed by another molecular assay, and 7 (19%) by sequencing, confirming low viral level. Most RNAemic blood donors donated in southern regions and in Paris. There was no difference in demographic data or duration parameter between RNAemic and non-RNAemic donors. Duration parameter was determined as the time elapsed between donation and: i) the onset of symptoms; ii) a positive NP RT-PCR; and iii) PDI. Cell culture experiments did not show any infectivity related to RNAemic plasmas. DISCUSSION: SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected in a small fraction of blood donors with PDI, reporting very low levels of RNA. The corresponding plasma is probably not infectious. These findings highlight the value of haemovigilance and PDI to guide blood safety strategies.

Les coulisses d'une étude clinique à l'EFS

Le cadre réglementaire français des recherches : la loi dite Jardé publiée en 2012 a été discutée plus de 5 ans pour entrer en vigueur en novembre 2016. Deux catégories de recherches co-existent : celles impliquant la personne humaine (RIPH) examinées par un CPP, et par opposition les « non RIPH » examinées par le HDH/CESREES/CNIL. Les RIPH sont de type 1 (interventionnelles à risque), 2 (interventionnelles à risque et contraintes minimes), ou 3 (non interventionnelles). Toute recherche qui traite des données en lien avec la personne doit aussi être en conformité avec le Règlement européen sur la protection des données (RGPD). Ainsi, de nombreuses recherches sur échantillons biologiques entrent désormais dans les RIPH3. Illustration de ce cadre réglementaire avec l'exemple de PlasmACov2, étude EFS qualifiée de RIPH3, qui a permis de constituer et de caractériser une banque de plasmas thérapeutiques de personnes guéries de la COVID-19 permettant leur évaluation dans l'essai thérapeutique de l'AP–HP, CORIPLASM qualifié de RIPH1 ;et du projet COVIDonneur, une étude de séroprévalence du SARS-CoV2 dans la population des donneurs de sang, qualifiée de RIPH3. Ce cadre français peut sembler complexe, mais il offre avec ses trois catégories de recherches et ses méthodologies de référence, une homogénéité basée sur le risque encouru par le participant. Ainsi le promoteur, responsable de la recherche doit déterminer très tôt quelle est la catégorie de sa recherche, celle-ci ayant un impact sur les démarches technico-réglementaires, sur les délais et sur les documents qui encadrent le projet tels que le protocole, l'information des personnes et le cahier de recueil des données. (French) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Transfusion Clinique et Biologique is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

DGVRetroDon : contribution à l'évaluation du risque de transmission du SARS-CoV-2 par transfusion par un dépistage de l'ARN viral plasmatique dans des dons de sang en France

Lors de l'émergence de l'épidémie de SARS-CoV-2, la question d'une possible transmission par transfusion du virus a été évoquée avec la mise en évidence d'ARN dans le plasma de donneurs de sang. Une étude rétrospective a été réalisée à partir d'échantillons de biothèque transfusionnelle issus de dons de sang prélevés au pic épidémique en France (du 23 au 28 mars 2020), dans les régions les plus impactées (NORD et EST). Selon plusieurs hypothèses de prévalence, la taille d'échantillon minimale a été estimée à 6000. Le dépistage a été réalisé sur des pools de 4 échantillons (P4) par une méthode automatisée (Procleix SARS-CoV-2, Panther System, Grifols). 9672 échantillons ont été testés sous la forme de 2418 pools (P4). Cinq pools ont été dépistés positifs. Sur les 20 échantillons unitaires composant ces pools expertisés au CNR RIT (INTS), 1 seul a été confirmé par 2 méthodes différentes de RT-PCR, avec de faibles intensités réactionnelles suggérant une très faible charge virale. La mise en culture du plasma correspondant n'a pas permis d'isoler le virus. Cet échantillon provenait d'une donneuse ayant décrit rétrospectivement des symptômes évocateurs de COVID-19 dans les jours suivant son don (sans avoir été testée). Aucun EIR n'a été mis en évidence lors de l'enquête d'hémovigilance réalisée chez les receveurs du CGR et du MCP issus du don ARN SARS-CoV-2 positif. Cette étude confirme la possible présence d'ARN du virus SARS-CoV-2 dans le plasma de donneurs de sang asymptomatiques, à taux très faible, avec une prévalence d'environ 1/10 000 dons en période épidémique, sans que le caractère infectieux n'ait été démontré. (French) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Transfusion Clinique et Biologique is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Protocole d'usage thérapeutique du plasma de convalescent de COVID-19–Suivi

L'ANSM a autorisé dans une décision du 29.04.2020, la collecte, la préparation, la conservation, la distribution et la délivrance du plasma de convalescent COVID-19 (PCC), celle-ci étant réalisée dans le cadre d'un protocole d'utilisation thérapeutique (PUT) pour les patients ayant une infection sévère à SARS-CoV-2 selon divers critères d'éligibilité. L'anonymisation de la demande est effectuée si l'indication a été validée en réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire et que le patient a donné son consentement à la transfusion. Le nombre de demandes hebdomadaires de PCC fluctue beaucoup, avec un pic à 54 fin avril-début mai 2021. Au 13,07.2021, plus de 1000 demandes ont été reçues. Parmi les patients ayant reçu au moins un PCC, environ 2/3 sont des hommes et la quasi-totalité ont une comorbidité. Les patients sont âgés de quelques mois à 93 ans, 14 étant des enfants (6 de 0–9 ans, 8 de 10–19 ans). La distribution des groupes sanguins est similaire à celle de la population générale. À la demande de l'ANSM, un suivi avec le détail des transfusions, la survenue éventuelle d'un effet indésirable receveur ainsi que l'évolution du patient jusqu'à un bilan final est demandé et a été reçu pour une partie des patients. Certains ont bénéficié de plusieurs épisodes transfusionnels : deux pour 38 patients, et trois pour 6 patients avec une demande de suivi par séquençage viral à la recherche de sélection de variant. Les données des patients seront rétrospectivement incluses dans une cohorte nationale, dont le promoteur est l'IMEA et l'EFS un collaborateur scientifique, cohorte dans laquelle les patients recevant du PCC dans le cadre du PUT seront inclus prospectivement. (French) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Transfusion Clinique et Biologique is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Organisation de la collecte, préparation, qualification et mise à disposition de plasmas issus de donneurs convalescents de la COVID-19

Les sujets guéris (dits convalescents) ont constitué une immunité, notamment sous la forme d'anticorps spécifiques avec une activité neutralisante dans leur plasma. Ce plasma capable de transférer cette immunité de façon immédiate à un malade a été utilisé dans le passé pour le traitement de maladies infectieuses. L'EFS a mis à disposition des plasmas issus de donneurs convalescents de la COVID19 (PCC). Les donneurs guéris depuis au moins 14j donnent leur plasma par aphérèse. Le don est viro-atténué par Intercept (Cerus). Aux analyses de qualification biologique habituelles s'ajoutent la recherche des Ac anti-SARS-CoV-2, le titrage de leur pouvoir neutralisant et un dépistage du VHE. Le traitement des malades prévoit une transfusion de deux PCC puis de deux autres 24 h plus tard. Entre avril 2020 et mai 2021, 5600 plasmaphérèses ont été prélevées et préparées dans 4 à 7 régions. Selon les périodes, entre 47 et 65 % des dons étaient conformes. Ces PCC ont été transfusés à 60 patients malades de la COVID-19 dans un essai clinique national (CORIPLASM) afin d'évaluer leur efficacité. Par ailleurs, plus de 1000 patients en ont bénéficié dans le cadre compassionnel du Protocole d'Utilisation Thérapeutique. L'EFS s'est rapidement organisé pour disposer de PCC spécialement qualifiés. La transfusion de PCC semble être bénéfique chez les patients immunosupprimés, ainsi que chez les patients âgés et ceux ayant des facteurs de comorbidité pris en charge de façon très précoce. Les prélèvements se poursuivent avec des critères de sélection affinés. (French) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Transfusion Clinique et Biologique is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs are present in ~4% of uninfected individuals over 70 years old and account for ~20% of COVID-19 deaths.

Circulating autoantibodies (auto-Abs) neutralizing high concentrations (10 ng/mL, in plasma diluted 1 to 10) of IFN-α and/or -ω are found in about 10% of patients with critical COVID-19 pneumonia, but not in subjects with asymptomatic infections. We detect auto-Abs neutralizing 100-fold lower, more physiological, concentrations of IFN-α and/or -ω (100 pg/mL, in 1/10 dilutions of plasma) in 13.6% of 3,595 patients with critical COVID-19, including 21% of 374 patients > 80 years, and 6.5% of 522 patients with severe COVID-19. These antibodies are also detected in 18% of the 1,124 deceased patients (aged 20 days-99 years; mean: 70 years). Moreover, another 1.3% of patients with critical COVID-19 and 0.9% of the deceased patients have auto-Abs neutralizing high concentrations of IFN-ß. We also show, in a sample of 34,159 uninfected subjects from the general population, that auto-Abs neutralizing high concentrations of IFN-α and/or -ω are present in 0.18% of individuals between 18 and 69 years, 1.1% between 70 and 79 years, and 3.4% >80 years. Moreover, the proportion of subjects carrying auto-Abs neutralizing lower concentrations is greater in a subsample of 10,778 uninfected individuals: 1% of individuals <70 years, 2.3% between 70 and 80 years, and 6.3% >80 years. By contrast, auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-ß do not become more frequent with age. Auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs predate SARS-CoV-2 infection and sharply increase in prevalence after the age of 70 years. They account for about 20% of both critical COVID-19 cases in the over-80s, and total fatal COVID-19 cases.